Let’s rewind to the early 70s:
Nixon was President.
Mao was Chairman.
Elvis was on tour.
The first pocket calculator was released.
Japan’s stock market was the darling of the investment world.
From 1970 to 1979, Japan’s stock market was up 396% versus the US, which was only up 77%.
Then the 80s happened:
Michael Jackson released Thriller.
E.T. was the highest grossing film of the decade.
The War on Drugs began.
Apple Computer introduced Macintosh.
Japan’s stock market remained the darling of the investment world.
From 1980 to 1989, Japan’s stock market was up 1,143% versus the US, which was only up 404%.
Japan’s stock market grew so big that it accounted for 45% of the global stock market cap. The US followed at 33%. Eight out of ten of the largest corporations in the world were Japanese.
And the 90s were interesting too:
The World Wide Web arrived.
Friends and Seinfeld ruled TV.
We all bought a Discman.
Microsoft hit its stride.
Global warming became a concern.
Japan’s stock market lost itsluster.
From 1990 to 1999, Japan’s stock market was down 7% versus the US, which was up 433%.
The 2000s were globalising:
The iPod showed up, then the iPhone.
9-11 shocked the world.
Euro was adopted.
Google and Facebook connected all of us.
The global financial crisis.
From 2000 to 2009, Japan’s stock market was down 30%, the US was down 9%, and emerging markets led the pack, up 162%.
Decade-by-Decade Returns of Global Markets (USD)
Over the course of 20 years from 1970 to 1989, Japan market rose over 6,100%,US market rose 890%,and the rest of the developed world rose just over 1,100%
How would you have positioned your investments for the future at that point in time? It would have been easy to say Japan was overheating after the 1970s, but you would have missed another ten years of Japan’s dominance.
In the following 27 years from 1990 to 2017, Japan returned a pathetic 120%, The US returned 1,374%,and the rest of the developed world rose 1089%.
Trying to asset allocate tactically by market is no easy feat. Some investors say they want to ‘passively’ own the S&P 500 only, but this is actually an active decision that forgoes most of the world.
We prefer to own a truly globally diversified portfolio - one that we can stick with through geopolitical, economic, and pop culture shocks.
It will likely not be the best performing portfolio at some points in time, as it will be dragged down by its level of diversification. But that being said, it will avoid the far bigger evil: periods of missing out on stock market growth in other parts of the world.