Inflation: no rerun of that ’70s show

Recently, it feels like the talk of inflation is all consuming. From grocery stores to the front pages of every financial newspaper, rising prices — and their impact on daily lives — are on everyone’s mind. One only has to do a quick Google Trends search to see that since the mainstream adoption of the Internet, our current collective awareness of inflation is truly off the scales (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Internet search trends show unprecedented interest in rising prices

(Note: Interest over time numbers represent search interest relative to the highest point on the chart for the given region and time. A value of 100 is the peak popularity for the term. A value of 50 means that the term is half as popular. A score of 0 means there was not enough data for this term.)

Perhaps most ominously for investors, what used to be couched as a ‘transitory’ post-Covid price reversion has now started to sound much more rooted in policymaker rhetoric. Markets have priced in this change of attitude and are now bracing for a sharp tightening of monetary conditions from central bankers looking to regain credibility after a year of inflation "surprises" and accelerating price rises.

Faced by this once-in-a-generation phenomenon, commentators have started to look back in time to the inflationary wave of the 1970’s for clues about what could befall markets. While it is easy to draw parallels with the 70’s oil-induced inflation initially, a closer look at the drivers of recent price rises shows that the script for this latest wave of inflation is different. We believe that policy mistakes from central bankers pose the greatest risk to the economy right now. In short, we are more worried about the US Federal Reserve than we are about inflation.

No '70s replay

The main argument against a rerun of the 1970's style inflation is monetary. What drove prices five decades ago was a sustained and significant increase in the money supply. While it is true that policies enacted to address the pandemic did cause the supply of money to rise at the fastest rate since the 1970s, these have either run their course or been rolled back, which in turn triggered a sharp deceleration in the growth of new money over recent months.

Figure 2: Money supply growth has fallen as post-Covid monetary support rolls off

We also see no repeat of the credit-led money creation of the 70’s. In fact, bank lending activity has remained below the long-term average throughout the pandemic.

Historically, it has taken three years (33 months) for adjustments in the supply of money to be reflected in consumer prices. By this measure, inflation is already primed to retreat — right at the time that policymakers are starting to become much more militant about fighting it. This in our view, raises the prospects that central bankers will tighten too far, too fast, which could cause significant harm to economic growth and trigger more market volatility.

Causes of inflation not entrenched

We see the underlying cause of recent inflation as much less entrenched than the hawkish tone taken by central bankers would warrant.

If we analyse the factors driving inflation since the pandemic, it is evident that a significant portion is attributable to energy, food and goods — which all remain plagued by pandemic-related bottlenecks, rising oil prices and, more recently, conflict in Ukraine. These sharp increases have all started to be reflected in the core inflation readings that usually instruct the views of policymakers looking to strip out volatile elements of the inflation picture that are not easily swayed by monetary policy.

Figure 3: US CPI data show inflation remains driven by COVID-related supply shocks

We note that services inflation — which had contributed the lion’s share of inflation in the run-up to the pandemic — has remained much more in line with long-term trends, even if it has started to tick up in recent months.

Although there is no hiding the fact that recent price increases have been broad, we still think that the true underlying causes remain transitory and linked to the nature of the shock that the pandemic imposed on the economy.

We recognise that further inflation could trigger an "adaptive expectations" feedback loop where workers factor in persistent inflation in their wage settlement negotiations but expect this risk to moderate in the coming months as the bottlenecks that have been driving recent price rises start to ease.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s consumer inflation expectation survey reflects this transitory view on inflation, showing that consumers expect inflation to moderate to 4% on a three-year horizon — significantly less than the 6% short-term expected inflation for the coming year. Long-term inflation expectations have also started to retreat from recent highs (figure 4).

Figure 4: Long-term consumer inflation expectations remain stable

Recent consumer sentiment surveys are also signalling that an easing of inflationary pressure is on the cards. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment survey has been trending at its lowest level since the financial crisis, indicative of a near-term drop in demand that would be deflationary in nature. Additionally, survey data show that consumers have been putting off large purchases, the opposite of what is usually seen when consumers expect further price rises and try to bring forward purchases to pre-empt price rises (figure 5).

Figure 5: Consumer sentiment negatively impacted by inflation

Policy risk

The challenge presented to policymakers in this round of tightening is that they will be pulling on levers that impact on demand to try and address transient supply problems, which are largely exogenous to the monetary system. Threading the needle between rolling back the post-Covid monetary support while keeping growth on track will prove tricky.

Although some of the recent policymaker rhetoric can be attributed to a desire to regain credibility after having kept rates low for so long in this cycle, the risks that inflation continues to overshoot their targets cannot be ignored. However, we believe that these risks will fade in the near term as the erosion of consumer spending power and the conflict in Ukraine start to weigh on growth forecasts. In turn, we expect to see a dialling back of the hawkish language, which should relieve some of the recent market uncertainty.

This article was originally published in May by Janus Henderson Investors.

Janus Henderson Investors is a global asset manager offering a full suite of actively managed investment products across asset classes. Established through the merger of Janus Capital and Henderson in 2017, Janus Henderson’s history as independent investment managers stretches back to 1934.

<divider><divider>

Janus Henderson Investors disclaimer

Issued in Singapore by Janus Henderson Investors (Singapore) Limited, which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). We are a member of the Investment Management Association of Singapore and an approved fund management company under the Central Provident Fund Investment Scheme. Please note that your use of this site is governed by the Legal Information on the site. This advertisement has not been reviewed by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. By proceeding to access this site, you are deemed to have accepted those terms. We may record telephone calls made to our office for our mutual protection and to improve customer service.

Janus Henderson Investors (Singapore) Limited and its affiliates are referred to herein as Janus Henderson Investors. This website is intended for residents in Singapore only. Non-Singapore residents are responsible for observing all applicable laws and regulations of their relevant jurisdictions before accessing the information contained herein. While this website provides information on Janus Henderson Investors products, such information should not be regarded as an offer or a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any of such investments. The information contained in this website is obtained and / or compiled from sources believed to be reliable and current. However, Janus Henderson Investors cannot and does not warrant, guarantee or represent, either expressly or impliedly, the accuracy, validity or completeness of such information. Janus Henderson Investors or any directors or employees or representatives of Janus Henderson Investors shall not be liable for (whether in tort or contract or otherwise) any damages arising from any person's reliance on this information and shall not be liable for any errors or omissions (including but not limited to errors or omissions made by third party sources) in this information. The information contained in this website should not be regarded as a substitute for the exercise of your own judgement. Any information and views provided herein is subject to change without further notice. None of the material, nor its content, nor any copy of it, maybe altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without prior express written permission of Janus Henderson Investors.

Investment involves risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested. The value of the units and the income from the funds may fall as well as rise. Past performance of any manager and/or fund and any opinions, forecasts, assumptions, estimates made are not necessarily indicative of the future performance of the manager and/or fund. Investors should note that the information provided herein may not have set out all the risks and other significant aspects involved in investing in any Janus Henderson Investors products mentioned herein and should therefore refer to the relevant prospectus and product highlights sheet for details and are advised to obtain professional advice where appropriate before deciding whether to invest in units of the funds. The prospectuses and product highlights sheets of the funds are available and may be obtained from Janus Henderson Investors' office in Singapore and the participating distributors' offices or branches.

<divider><divider>

Endowus disclaimer

Investment involves risk. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up, and you may not get the full amount you invested. Past performance is not an indicator nor a guarantee of future performance. Rates of exchange may cause the value of investments to go up or down. Individual stock performance does not represent the return of a fund. 

Any forward-looking statements, prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or economic trends of the markets contained in this material are subject to market influences and contingent upon matters outside the control of Endow.us Pte. Ltd (“Endowus”) and therefore may not be realised in the future. Further, any opinion or estimate is made on a general basis and subject to change without notice. In presenting the information above, none of Endowus Pte. Ltd., its affiliates, directors, employees, representatives or agents have given any consideration to, nor have made any investigation of the objective, financial situation or particular need of any user, reader, any specific person or group of persons. Therefore, no representation is made as to the completeness and adequacy of the information to make an informed decision. You should carefully consider (i) whether any investment views and products/ services are appropriate in view of your investment experience, objectives, financial resources and relevant circumstances. You may also wish to seek financial advice through a financial advisor or the Endowus platform and independent legal, accounting, regulatory or tax advice, as appropriate.